The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!
Is Climate change total nonsense?
in Science
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 57%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Climate change    communist governments   political game   argument  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
My reply ....Because you say so , superb argument
You say .....It is just a political game which is played by communist governments
My reply .....Which governments can you name them?
You say ......that want to disrupt and damage the capitalist society.
My reply ......Why do they want to disrupt and damage?
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 70%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Climate change    communist governments   total nonsense.My reply   superb argument  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
You deal with the communist side and I'll deal with the capitalist side. That's called debate. Just stating that there are two sides to an argument is not going anywhere productive and is heading for a fast stalemate.
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 60%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: communist side    capitalist side   sides   argument  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 64%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.72  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Climate change    rejection of climate change   communist side   communist governments  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
I never said the word "fascist". Thus, I can't reply to your question. I said "capitalist". which is very different to fascist. If the capitalist society has rejected climate change it is only because the evidence suggests that the climate is not changing. Thus, they are just stating the obvious and are not playing a political game.
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.74  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
there an almost unanimous consensus of scientists that think carbon dioxide is going the large majority of our warming. we have as much carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than we've had for millions of years.
don't you think your unsubstantiated rants about climate change look pretty stupid when you consider the above premises?
  Considerate: 35%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: carbon dioxide    unanimous consensus of scientists   much carbon dioxide   atmosphere  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Why do they want to disrupt and damage the capitalist society ?
They see capitalism as a threat to communism. That's why. Communism has lots a perks and they can get cheap labour from people. You can put all the people who disagree with you into prison or have them executed etc.
  Considerate: 66%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: capitalist society    cheap labour   communism   people  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 73%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
The facts are that the climate is not changing. If any government says that it is, then, they are telling lies. I don't really care if they are fascists or communists. Note - You contradicted yourself. Fascism and communists can't be opposites if they are the same.
  Considerate: 50%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.52  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: facts    government   Fascism   communists  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 54%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: facts    government   Fascism   misrepresentation  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Humanity has been walking the face of the earth for 315,000 years.
A computer, can't speak for what a scientist, or scientists program into it via their individual keyboards, to come up with a hypothetical situation, and expect others to view their findings as 100% fact?
As I expressed before, the earth is going to do what it does, when it does, and all humanity can consciously do, is adapt to what this planet does, as humanity coexists with it?
And live with the heat, the cold, the freezing, the flooding, the tsunamis, the earthquakes, and the nor'easters.
Climate Change, is but a perception from a group of individuals, and their views on a planet that is 4.5 Billion years, and try to understand it with their 315,000 years worth of human made limited knowledge?
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: years worth    individual keyboards   face of the earth   hypothetical situation  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 66%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.24  
  Sources: 3  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: communist governments    Climate change   political extremes   political game  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
You obviously haven't studied the history behind communism and fascism. Otherwise, you would have known that communism and fascism was introduced by capitalists as a way of getting cheap labour in foreign countries like Russia and China. It is all about creating a slave labour environment. In the case of Germany 1930's, they used the Jews for manual labour and in the case of China and Russia they use their own people with a rigid class system and a false promise of a better future which.never eventuates. But I can see that you are trying to divert the debate away from climate change and into a debate about political definitions and history.
  Considerate: 58%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: cheap labour    case of Germany 1930's   slave labour environment   manual labour  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Your conclusion - As you can see, the conclusion does not logically follow on from the premises.
My response - You haven't asked for or seen any evidence on this matter and you have already assumed that my premise is faulty.
Note - Your conclusion assumes that communist governments are logical organisations that wouldn't ever deceive anybody or do any harm.
Now, if we look at the person who started the climate change hysteria way back in 1972 was a person by the name of Maurice Strong.
Agenda 21.
Reference - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/paris-climate-change-conference/12035401/Farewell-to-the-man-who-invented-climate-change.html
Thus, we can see that climate change is just a deception created by communist sympathisers such as Maurice Strong.
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.2  
  Sources: 3  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: climate change hysteria way    communist governments   name of Maurice Strong.Agenda 21.Reference   climate change  
  Relevant (Beta): 83%  
  Learn More About Debra
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: response    position   debate    
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Oh, I have forced you to be honest and provide evidence. And now that I have provided evidence, you are no longer interested in playing the game. You should join your communist comrades in China.
Note - The title of the debate is about climate change and you have tried to derail the debate by turning it into a debate about political definitions and other pedantic nonsense.
  Considerate: 43%  
  Substantial: 71%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: title of the debate    climate change   communist comrades   political definitions  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
You just love attacking that straw man don't you.
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.7  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: straw man         
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 31%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.6  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: red herring         
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say .....
They see capitalism as a threat to communism.
My reply .....Who are “they” which countries are claiming to be communist?
You say .....
That's why.
My reply .....Merely an assertion on your part with no proof
You say ..
...Communism has lots a perks and they can get cheap labour from people.
My reply .....And of course in capitalist systems there is no such thing as cheap labour, right?
You say ......You can put all the people who disagree with you into prison or have them executed etc.
My reply .....Name a country that’s doing this at the moment?
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: communism.My reply    cheap labour   etc.My reply   capitalist systems  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
List of countries that are currently under despotic dictatorship and severe censorship.
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 39%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 48%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.42  
  Sources: 51  
  Relevant (Beta): 26%  
  Learn More About Debra
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 47%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: communism.My reply    cheap labour   Good luck btw   etc.My reply  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
The actual true and funny thing is that I haven't even presented any argument about whether it not I am for climate change yet. All I have done so far is just expose the nonsensical error in Akhenaten's argument quoted above.
But as usual Akhenaten continues to respond and argue with an imaginary opponent. Sad really.
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.66  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: political game    funny thing   communist governments   Climate change  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
I know. A snake crawls low on the ground and never engages the enemy. They just flee when the going gets too tough. lol
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: snake    ground   enemy    
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Climate change is nothing more than a truth that does not state a whole truth. Global Warming, Climate change, and Human climate manipulation are not all equal truths to be told or explained in detail.
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.44  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Climate change    Global Warming   political game   communist governments  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
The most noted issue in climate change is the contradiction in the basic principle made by people who are stating a grievance publicly. Climates must change it is a normal process, a fact of science. Climates are being told that through carelessness of manufacturing and energy consumption people manipulate the temperature of our earth.
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: noted issue    climate change   basic principle   normal process  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: lot of people    climate   fair argument    
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 67%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 63%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: .........    Time wasters paradise   tock    
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
There are two kinds of change manipulation and natural change, human manipulation presents a who truth and is not what is taking place with a topic which allows for natural changes to the environment to be included in debate.
Example: Presuming as united state there is a threat by human manipulation which posses danger. Is the threat of Co2 greater than Salt as any de -ice in the winter movers temperature by change? The science dictates the Salt as de-ice is a solid and exchanged fast change in temperature. Is there now a scientific contradiction that solids move heat slower faster a faster gas like Co2?
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.28  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: united state    kinds of change manipulation   Example   ZeusAres42  
  Relevant (Beta): 71%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 14%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 0%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 70%  
  Learn More About Debra
You said ......It’s a political game which is played by communist governments that want to disrupt and damage the capitalist society.
My reply ......So countries like Western Sahara and Saudi Arabia are trying to spread communism to keep wages down?
You said .....Communism has lots a perks and they can get cheap labour from people.
My reply ......So oil rich Saudi Arabia are now communists who are attempting to disrupt our countries to get cheap labour?
You say ......List of countries that are currently under despotic dictatorship and severe censorship.
My reply ......I thought you said communist countries? It’s now communist and despotic countries pushing this horrific plan on the rest of us
Capitalist societies have plenty of available cheap labour they need why would communists want to disrupt to get what we already have , or do you deny this also?
  Considerate: 64%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: cheap labour    communist governments   Saudi Arabia   capitalist society.My reply  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say ......Good luck btw trying to have a debate with someone that obviously has an IQ only slightly higher than that of a chimpanzee.
My reply ......That’s a grossly unfair comparison to the unfortunate chimpanzees
  Considerate: 35%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Good luck btw    unfair comparison   chimpanzee   debate  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Why don't you go read the agenda 21 documents and get yourself informed before shooting off your big mouth.
Capitalists get all their stuff manufactured in communist countries. They are not stupid.
  Considerate: 24%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: big mouth.Capitalists    communist countries   agenda   documents  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say ......
Why don't you go read the agenda 21 documents and get yourself informed before shooting off your big mouth.
My reply .....I’m very well informed thank you. Thank you for informing me Saudi Arabia turned Communist overnight and are attempting to push communism on the U S to secure cheap labour , the news hasn’t broken here yet
You say .....Capitalists get all their stuff manufactured in communist countries. They are not stupid.
My reply ......Yet another claim without proof , so going on this latest contention the U S manufactures nothing it’s all made by communists who you claim are attempting to push this agenda on capitalists who already avail of cheap commie labour , so why would they need to push it?
Why are you not attacking capitalists for using cheap commie labour you Doofus
  Considerate: 37%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: cheap labour    big mouth.My reply   U S   Saudi Arabia  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
The earth is 4.5 Billion years old.
Humanity has been walking the face of the earth for 315,000 years.
A computer, can't speak for what a scientist, or scientists program into it via their individual keyboards, to come up with a hypothetical situation, and expect others to view their findings as 100% fact?
As I expressed before, the earth is going to do what it does, when it does, and all humanity can consciously do, is adapt to what this planet does, as humanity coexists with it?
And live with the heat, the cold, the freezing, the flooding, the tsunamis, the earthquakes, and the nor'easters.
Climate Change, is but a perception from a group of individuals, and their views on a planet that is 4.5 Billion years, and try to understand it with their 315,000 years worth of human made limited knowledge?
But to put humanity into perspective.
Just like with the inception of the computer and the internet, communication as we know it, changed, because man, in some situations, chose to change it, by placing an eletronic device between themselves and another?
A climate change, on how we communicate.
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.52  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: years worth    pro climate change individuals   limited knowledge   individual keyboards  
  Relevant (Beta): 76%  
  Learn More About Debra
Just go check all your consumer items where they were made. You will find that most were made in communist or other dictatorial countries.
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 58%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: consumer items    dictatorial countries      
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say .......Just go check all your consumer items where they were made. You will find that most were made in communist or other dictatorial countries.
My reply .....You keep saying that yet, you keep saying that commies are trying to push their agenda on us to get cheap labour when all along it’s Capitalists exploiting commies by underpaying them , you are not very bright are you?
  Considerate: 44%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: dictatorial countries.My reply    cheap labour   agenda   Capitalists  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
This debate is about climate change. Yet you keep pushing the debate into further and further nonsense subjects until it becomes totally irrelevant. You are looking for the smallest/tiniest loop hole that you can find to squirm your way out of a stinky situation.
The important fact is that climate change is a deception which the rich/totalitarian elite wants to create a world government which undermines peoples freedom through the sneaky use of climate change as a red herring.
Just watch the agenda 21 documentary or take up knitting as a hobby.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGCkSRXo-jk
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.94  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: climate change    world government   important fact   tiniest loop hole  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
Climate change is not nonsense. Climate change is a fact that Earth has experienced long before we were ever here and that will continue long after we are gone. The real question we should be asking is; does the current observable climate change we are experiencing present an existential threat to humanity on Earth? Also, we should ask several other pertinent questions, namely; if the rate and trend of current climate change is particularly unusual and dangerous, what accounts for it and what would be the most effective approach to the problem- if one actually exists- that world governments could take? Also, if the issue is strictly one of science, why is it that the debate splits nearly perfectly along political lines?
My belief is that we are in the midst of an unusual climate event lasting about 30 or so years now. Part of it is likely due to human emissions but considering the tiny percentage of CO2 in our atmosphere that is attributable to human activities, it is highly unlikely that humans are on the verge of destroying the planet. It is estimated that mankind produces about .28% of all greenhouse gases produced on Earth, hardly the stuff of nightmare doomsday scenarios. Solar cycles are almost entirely ignored by climate alarmists. The fact is that when we experience the next great solar minimum, the entire AGW argument will necessarily fizzle into the dustbin of history. Remember that the great global cooling scare of the 1970's was also attributed to human pollution. How is it that the vaunted scientists of both eras are trying to have it both ways?
The average global temperature has risen about .8 degrees in the last 170 years. Those years have been marked by numerous, periodic spikes and plunges in temperatures. People have tended to predict that the end was near practically every time they happen. The likelihood that the recent warming trend is some looming catastrophe is infinitesimally small but that doesn't mean we should ignore it. If human pollution is contributing to the naturally occurring cycles of our climate, then we absolutely should address it, and we have.
Anyone of a certain age will remember how bad air and water pollution was back in the 50's and 60's. Automobiles spewed practically unmitigated leaded gasoline fumes and industries used rivers as sewers for toxic waste. Those days are over thanks to the cooperative and symbiotic efforts of both government and the private sector in developing pollution mitigation equipment and devices and mandating their use. We have a much cleaner environment as a result. Technology has advanced at an exponential rate in the last few decades. Our best hope for pollution mitigation is to incentivize the private sector to continue to develop practical and efficient clean energy AND to develop technologies that allow us to continue using our existing fossil fuels and the infrastructure built around them but to burn those fuels with drastically less emissions. Does anyone really believe we have advanced as far as possible in the technology of pollution mitigation? So, why do we never hear anyone involved in the AGW movement address clean-burning of fossil fuels?
Based on my observations of the AGW issue and the debate surrounding it over the last 30 years, it is clear that the global political left have seized upon the issue for political gain. While no one can discount or discredit all of the scientific findings on the issue, there have been far too many instances where the issue has been callously exploited to advance leftists' quest for power and control. People on the left frequently cite "scientific consensus" as proof of their hypothesis. No one ever seems to explain when "scientific consensus" became proof of anything, let alone an acceptable way to reach a conclusion using the scientific method. If "scientific consensus" is so compelling, why has the left resorted to a three-decade, non-stop barrage of hyperbole, propaganda, fear-mongering and outright lies to support their claims? Why have the predictions of their many computer models flamed out so spectacularly and repeatedly? Why have so many AGW proponents been quoted, saying openly that the climate change issue is NOT really about climate at all but about changing the socio-economic model used by the entire planet? And finally, why have those same AGW proponents relied almost exclusively on wildly ramped-up government control and massively higher taxes as their only "solution" to the problem?
It has become obvious to open-minded and well-informed observers that the climate change issue is being exploited to consolidate power and control and to divert trillions of dollars into the pockets of people who support the leftist power base. One need look no further than the Democrat Party, Al Gore, Tom Steyer, Elon Musk and the entire Silicon Valley.
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: real question    climate change nonsense   Climate change   human emissions  
  Relevant (Beta): 17%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say ......
This debate is about climate change. Yet you keep pushing the debate into further and further nonsense subjects until it becomes totally irrelevant. You are looking for the smallest/tiniest loop hole that you can find to squirm your way out of a stinky situation.
My reply ..... I know what’s it’s about it’s your conspiracy theory and you stated ......
It is just a political game which is played by communist governments that want to disrupt and damage the capitalist society........
My reply .....Yet you admitted that capitalists are exploiting communist workers and using them as cheap labour which is a total contradiction of your nonsense, you claimed oil rich Saudi Arabia was communist , everything you say is nonsense
You say ......
The important fact is that climate change is a deception which the rich/totalitarian elite wants to create a world government which undermines peoples freedom through the sneaky use of climate change as a red herring.
Just watch the agenda 21 documentary or take up knitting as a hobby.
My reply .....First you said it was a plot by communists now it’s the rich elite I actually think you’re mentally unbalanced
  Considerate: 47%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: communist governments    climate change   capitalist society   conspiracy theory  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
You don't seem to understand that elite power bases are universal and just have different names but they all basically do the same thing which is undermine the middle classes which they see as a threat to their power and control.
It's like trying to educate a small child because you don't have any political education or knowledge of history.
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: different names    elite power bases   middle classes   small child  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Try reading the debate posts before posting stuff that may already have been mentioned. That way your post may have some relevance to the current discussions.
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 50%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: debate posts    way   post   relevance  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say .....
You don't seem to understand that elite power bases are universal and just have different names but they all basically do the same thing which is undermine the middle classes which they see as a threat to their power and control.
My reply .....
Utter nonsense
You say ......
It's like trying to educate a small child because you don't have any political education or knowledge of history.
My reply .....Several people on here have claimed you’re an idiot I think that’s insulting to idiots , you’re beyond idiocy
  Considerate: 16%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: elite power bases    different names   middle classes   control.My reply  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 7%  
  Substantial: 65%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.48  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: reply    people   idiot   Dee  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
I did read the entire thread prior to posting. The problem is that several posters are getting way off the subject and resorting to name-calling instead of defending their arguments. Thanks, though.
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 58%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.36  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: entire thread    problem   posters   Thanks  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
They refuse to defend the facts about climate change and instead go for ridiculing the person. Thus, you can't have a decent debate on this site. Note - This site is full of left-wing deceitful and ignorant people. Warning - Don't expect to get a fair debate here.
  Considerate: 50%  
  Substantial: 62%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.42  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: climate change    left-wing   decent debate   site  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
True Believers have morphed into a band of religious fanatics and their beliefs are now based more on faith than on science. As you already know, debating religious fanatics is generally fruitless.
The mountain of evidence that has disproven the so-called "science" backing the AGW theory is completely ignored by everyone in their "movement". That's why none of them will ever actually answer the questions they're asked or they will parrot the stock talking points supplied by the political left and immediately follow on with Alinskyite name-calling and ridicule. That's how you know you're winning the "debate".
This is the same phenomenon you see with extreme leftists who advocate for socialism and communism. Despite the spectacular failure of leftist governments all over the world during the last century and the hundred million people that they murdered, far left radicals cling to Marxist principles as if they still have solid credibility. It's mind boggling and you have to wonder how any reasonably intelligent person can believe the things they do.
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Have you studied the agenda 21 protocols?
They are planning to undermine democracy by creating international laws based on climate change principles. Thus, they can by-pass democratic processes like congress, parliament and local governments to implement draconian climate based emergency measures.
Thus, once they announce that the planet is in danger and needs to be protected from us polluting human beings you can be sure that human rights will be the first thing to go. Thus, the IPCC bureaucrats will ascend to power and take over the whole world and turn the world into a police state.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.16  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: democratic processes    local governments   IPCC bureaucrats   human beings  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
I am familiar with Agenda 21 but I never really studied it. My general belief is that More Government = Less Freedom and the rise of the globalist left is about as dangerous as anything in modern history. They are a seductive bunch with all of their promises to "take care" of everyone and everything. The only problem with that is that you only need to look at recent history to establish that they are completely incapable of delivering on any of the flowery promises they make. The only thing they ARE capable of accomplishing is subjugating the people who fall under their control.
I will never understand how there are SO many people in the world and in this country who are naive and gullible enough to be sucked in by the same false promises that Marxists have been making for over 170 years now. The only thing they've ever delivered is failure, oppression, misery and death.
  Considerate: 49%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra